REMOVAL OF SEAGULL NESTS THROUGHOUT THE YEAR - Wildlife Protection - Wildlife (2023)

Anonymous

Hi Gull and welcome to the RSPB Forum. Enjoy yourself here

Anyone that tells you that it is alright to kill seagulls who are not legitmate people are to be avoided at all costs. Sadly there are cowboys about who would happily kill gulls for a profit.

So you do not want to get yourself involved with people like that due to the serious legal technicalities of the issue at hand

I would ring your local Council and talk to the environmental Officer and see what they suggest what you do

Of course the RSPB moderators, and the other members will give you support her too.

Regards

Kathy and Dave

Trochilus

Welcome to the forums, Gull. The legal ins and outs of gull nest - or chick, heaven forbid - removal are quite complex, and the fact that the law is different for the two regular roof nesting species, the herring and lesser black-backed gull, whose chicks look practically identical,makes it even more difficult to 'do' anything about roof-nesting gulls and being certain that the actions stay within the law. Any other gull species is fully protected, and since there is no option in the law to remove their nests, correct identification of the birds is crucial.

However it sometimes looks in urban and suburban areas, gull numbers are declining in the UK - so much so that herring gull is now red-listed with somewhere around 60% population decline, and all other gull species are amber listed because of somewhat smaller but still worrying levels of population decline. Any action that prevents a bird from nesting and producing young in any one season will contribute to further declines in the species. Yes, roof-nesting gulls can be a big nuisance in some situations (more so for some people than others, which is an added complexity in the issue), but there are ways and means of preventing gulls from nesting on roofs where conflict can occur in the first place rather than allowing them to choose their nesting site and then have the nests destroyed. The best deterrent is dependent on the physical size, shape etc of the site, and advice can be sought from companies that specialise in bird deterrents, and from the local council who should also be able to advice on deterrents.

Those clauses in the Wildlife and Countryside Act that allow gull nests removed to protect public health do also stipulate that such methods can only be used if non-lethal methods have been tried and failed, and that the threat to public health is great enough to warrant such extreme action. It also needs to be pointed out that nuisance and damage to property are not legal reasons for nest removal or killing of chicks or adults. The only reason is public health, and even there, a specific one-off licence from Defra or one of thedevolvedenvironment departmentsis needed before lethal action can be resorted to, especially if killing of chicks and/or adult herring gullsis proposed. Anyone wanting to kill gulls of any age or remove nests needs to consult the specific terms and conditions of the Wildlife and Countryside Act licences before doing anything in order to ensure that any action taken is legal, and preferably also consulting the statutory conservation agency for further advice.

gull

In reply to Trochilus:

Trochilus said:

Welcome to the forums, Gull. The legal ins and outs of gull nest - or chick, heaven forbid - removal are quite complex, and the fact that the law is different for the two regular roof nesting species, the herring and lesser black-backed gull, whose chicks look practically identical,makes it even more difficult to 'do' anything about roof-nesting gulls and being certain that the actions stay within the law. Any other gull species is fully protected, and since there is no option in the law to remove their nests, correct identification of the birds is crucial.

However it sometimes looks in urban and suburban areas, gull numbers are declining in the UK - so much so that herring gull is now red-listed with somewhere around 60% population decline, and all other gull species are amber listed because of somewhat smaller but still worrying levels of population decline. Any action that prevents a bird from nesting and producing young in any one season will contribute to further declines in the species. Yes, roof-nesting gulls can be a big nuisance in some situations (more so for some people than others, which is an added complexity in the issue), but there are ways and means of preventing gulls from nesting on roofs where conflict can occur in the first place rather than allowing them to choose their nesting site and then have the nests destroyed. The best deterrent is dependent on the physical size, shape etc of the site, and advice can be sought from companies that specialise in bird deterrents, and from the local council who should also be able to advice on deterrents.

Those clauses in the Wildlife and Countryside Act that allow gull nests removed to protect public health do also stipulate that such methods can only be used if non-lethal methods have been tried and failed, and that the threat to public health is great enough to warrant such extreme action. It also needs to be pointed out that nuisance and damage to property are not legal reasons for nest removal or killing of chicks or adults. The only reason is public health, and even there, a specific one-off licence from Defra or one of thedevolvedenvironment departmentsis needed before lethal action can be resorted to, especially if killing of chicks and/or adult herring gullsis proposed. Anyone wanting to kill gulls of any age or remove nests needs to consult the specific terms and conditions of the Wildlife and Countryside Act licences before doing anything in order to ensure that any action taken is legal, and preferably also consulting the statutory conservation agency for further advice.

Thanks for your reply, I myself am against any removal of these birds and their nests. I love the seagulls and am positive they are herring gulls. I live on the kent coast near Botany Bay. The company who wishes to remove the nests have stipulated that if any action be taken against them for the removal of the nests they will not take any responsibility and any blame falls on the shoulders of the residents managenent company. There are 3 directors and I am one of them, unfortunately I am out voted. The area in question is approx 300 square metres. They pose no health risk whatsoever, just annoying for a few of the residents and for their cars!! Not even any dive bombing. The gull busting company they have contacted have no regard for these birds whatsoever and will probably destroy the eggs or kill the chicks. I was somewhat disgusted by their website. What can I do? I am wholeheartedly against this. Obviously, this is difficult for me because I have to live with the other residents but it goes against my morals to allow this to happen.

gull

In reply to Anonymous:

Nicki C said:

Hi Gull and welcome to the RSPB Forum. Enjoy yourself here

Anyone that tells you that it is alright to kill seagulls who are not legitmate people are to be avoided at all costs. Sadly there are cowboys about who would happily kill gulls for a profit.

So you do not want to get yourself involved with people like that due to the serious legal technicalities of the issue at hand

I would ring your local Council and talk to the environmental Officer and see what they suggest what you do

Of course the RSPB moderators, and the other members will give you support her too.

Regards

Kathy and Dave

Thanks for your reply. Yes they are cowboys and I have checked out their website. They are quite disgusting in their attitude to seagulls. It makes me sick to think that the directors of my management company wish to give them our money to destroy the seagulls and eggs. It is a complex situation. I am one of three directors who has been out voted. There is no real reason to remove the gulls other than they make a noise on the roof and poo on their cars. My local council, Thanet district council will surprise me if they come up with a solution. I shall try them after the holiday season when they re-open, but I am open to suggestion in the mean time. Thanks

Trochilus

In reply to gull:

The gull-busters are wrong in stating that they could wash their hands off any responsibility. If someone engages the services of a 'bird removal' company and the said company does something that contravenes the Wildlife and Countryside Act, both the company and whoever ordered the action to be done are equally liable in the eyes of the law. W&C Act is a piece of criminal law, and so wildlife offences are no trifling matter. I would seriously rethink the whole thing, but if the management committee continues to wish to go down the route of nest removal rather than deterrents, then at least use the services of a reputable company who know the law and will stay within the law. I think it is important for you to be absolutely clear of the current legal situation, and so please do contact Natural England and Defra wildlife licencing section for the most up to date information about the legal status of the different gull species. Considering that the birds are causing a nuisance rather than a public health problem, I would say that nest removal and other lethal control methods would be illegal in any case, so it is doubly important to discuss this with Natural England so that you know precisely where you stand with regard to the law. I don't have the telephone numbers at hand over the holidays, but if you give us a call in Wildlife Enquiries next week, I can let you have the relevant contacts.

redrobin

In reply to Trochilus:

Defra gives some very misleading information about this on their web site as this was brought up in parlament last year

the main thing is that these birds take at lest three years before they breed longer in most cases llonger

but the debate in parlament seemed not to realise this and allowing them to breed wont produce 1000s of birds that will continue to bird in the same area

the friedly bid watcher

Fieldfare

In reply to redrobin:

I can't really offer any advice, but you have my support as I know exactly what it's like to live alongside Herring Gulls and Herring Gull haters.. people talk so badly of these animals, it can get very depressing, especially if you love gulls like you and I.

I love Columbidae.

Anonymous

In reply to Fieldfare:

Fieldfare said:

I can't really offer any advice, but you have my support as I know exactly what it's like to live alongside Herring Gulls and Herring Gull haters.. people talk so badly of these animals, it can get very depressing, especially if you love gulls like you and I.

i find this sort of debate, interesting to say the least, i love birds more than most, i have run a rescue centre for over forty years, but do seagulls nest on my window ledges with lime rich droppings going all on my lovely windows, bricks or drive, or indeed my new car, (NO) how many complain when thier next door have a fire which is not only illigally, but very distressing for all those breathing in the fumes, has anyone posting tonight seen the damage, pigeons, seagulls or other birds can caurse on buildings, ok i will agree not the birds fault, but i am sorry dont we all have to live on this planet, removing gull nests without harm to birds, is not cruel, but please try thinking off all the argument not just a blinkered view. best regards mac (a bird lover)

skyblastomega1

In reply to Anonymous:

problem is with seagulls nesting on roofs is the fault of archeitects designing and building flats with flat roofs and other buildings with flat roofs if buildings had pitched roofs then the gulls would not nest on buildings.

Chris Bernard

Hi - I live in South Liverpool UK and gulls (Common gulls) have, for the first time since I moved into my house in 1988, started nesting on our chimney stacks. So a nest on each stack on both gable ends (4 parents?). I have bird boxes and feeders dotted about for small garden birds and I'm happy with all the other birds - larger ones include nearby crows, a max of 6 magpies regularly use our garden, and 6 wood pigeons, occasionally Jays, and most of the smaller birds you would expect to see in an urban garden. But the nuisance, harassment, and interminable 24/7 unbearable cacophony - nay torture of these Seagulls. We are well used to all the bird poo on our cars etc. We love living in a parkland neighbourhood so bird poo is part of the deal (I bought a jet wash). And if all the seagulls did was crap I would get on with that. It's the horrific screeching noise 24/7, they seem to be active at every hour of the day and always screeching. Obviously, sometimes there are extended periods of peace but that's rare and they are waking us at all hours now. As to using our garden - the minute one of us goes outside (front or rear) they kick-off, swooping down from their nests, flying above our heads, and screeching hysterically - harassment! I really did have a romantic view and enjoyed the occasional distant sound of seagulls. I fancy myself as a one with nature guy - especially in my love of birds but...
These gulls must still have chicks - I haven't seen any yet, but there were gull eggshells on the side path directly below the stack. To my horror, I've discovered that gulls nest permanently at the same site! So, when the chicks have fully-fledged any suggestions about what can I do to rid us of this awful nuisance. And it is truly awful and a nuisance. Can anyone suggest a definitive method that will prevent these Seagulls from returning and nesting on the chimney stack? Thank Chris B